I belong to the Facebook page “I have more books than friends”.
It’s not a high-volume site, but their posts are interesting, and I find it
very comfy to belong there, sort of like relaxing on the couch with an
interesting read. I’ve rarely met a book I didn’t like, especially where the
topic is history or genealogy or some associated subject.
I’ve gotten over the fact that my daughter has utilized online
textbooks for a few years now, though she occasionally stresses the seams of
her backpack. I love the ability to download new books, and to find
out-of-print books online. I keep thinking that I should have saved space by
now using digital books instead of more tall shelves, but alas, I need more
shelves. A couple of people who shall go unnamed have gently suggested that I
might prune my library. Ummm, no.
I mention this because of a startling development in the
RootsTech 2012 Conference
(www.rootstech.org). This is an annual conference geared toward genealogy
through technology – a very worthy undertaking and an educational opportunity
that many of us cannot do without. I say that not having attended the
conference personally, but by virtue of reading and hearing tons of useful output from it
last year. This year, however, the RootsTech group has decided
that we really only need that technology to do our research, that technology is
the only concern one would have while immersed in their educational seminars.
They have banned booksellers from the conference.
I’m all for technology. It makes my life easier, and at
times, it’s darn fun. I hope the group at RootsTech will rethink their
position, though. If you close your eyes and sniff a Kindle (please forward me photos if you do), does it have that
paper pulp woody smell, or the leatherbound feel of a slightly worn favorite book?
Maybe it’s possible to have a book’s
author sign their work from your mobile phone app, but won’t it slide off into mobile oblivion when
you run your fingers over it? (yes, this could be an issue with me and my touch
screen Android, but I digress) And
honestly, for those purists out there (makes guilty face), is a digital image
really the exact same thing as the original page from the book that's in your hand? Seriously, can you imagine a major genealogy
conference without booksellers (who also sell technology books)? I say pish-posh.
To assume that attendees at RootsTech 2012 would not want to
peruse the many booksellers of the genealogical sphere is absurd. A book is
still a book. I have autographed genealogy books that, to me, are absolute
treasures. Why not be a well-rounded genealogist, and utilize technology AND
good old-fashioned books? That’s what I’ve done, and will continue to do.
Hopefully, RootsTech will re-examine their position, and remember that kindness
and sharing takes the genealogist just as far as technology, and sometimes,
just a little bit farther.
No comments:
Post a Comment